<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pitch Count #14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crookedpitch.com/202/pitch-count-14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crookedpitch.com/202/pitch-count-14/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Baseball &#38; Fantasy Football</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PigBodine</title>
		<link>http://www.crookedpitch.com/202/pitch-count-14/comment-page-1/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>PigBodine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 20:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crookedpitch.com/202/pitch-count-14/#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>i don't see how the m's fans could view a bedard for jones deal in a negative way. jones was unimpressive in his major league at bats, i think he also lost much of his luster when they moved him to the OF from SS. it seems like if the m's thought highly of him, they would've given him more ab's instead of letting him sit on the bench. meanwhile bedard was absolutely lights out down the stretch, you could make a case for him being the best pitcher in the league before being shut sown as a precautionary measure. pitching wins in mlb plain and simple. bedard is a known quantity, a stud. jones is a toolsy prospect that really seem a dime a dozen, i would be more weary letting clement or morrow go. it seems like a down year for the al west and with the addition of a pitcher bedard's calaber would make them instantly competive. the m's should welcome bedard with open arms, another jones shopuld come along sooner than later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t see how the m&#8217;s fans could view a bedard for jones deal in a negative way. jones was unimpressive in his major league at bats, i think he also lost much of his luster when they moved him to the OF from SS. it seems like if the m&#8217;s thought highly of him, they would&#8217;ve given him more ab&#8217;s instead of letting him sit on the bench. meanwhile bedard was absolutely lights out down the stretch, you could make a case for him being the best pitcher in the league before being shut sown as a precautionary measure. pitching wins in mlb plain and simple. bedard is a known quantity, a stud. jones is a toolsy prospect that really seem a dime a dozen, i would be more weary letting clement or morrow go. it seems like a down year for the al west and with the addition of a pitcher bedard&#8217;s calaber would make them instantly competive. the m&#8217;s should welcome bedard with open arms, another jones shopuld come along sooner than later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
